
Exploring Tax Relief and Tax Solutions to Raise $1 Trillion for Climate Financing
As the world gears up for COP29 climate talks in Baku, Azerbaijan, one pressing question looms large: How can the global community raise the $1 trillion or more annually needed to support poorer nations in combating climate change?
While government contributions and private investments are key, new tax proposals are emerging as a powerful potential solution. Among the most discussed ideas are levies on shipping, aviation, fossil fuels, and financial transactions.
Shipping: A Taxable Route to Climate Financing
Shipping is responsible for about 3% of global carbon emissions, making it a prime candidate for taxation. The Global Solidarity Levies Task Force (GSLT)—led by France, Barbados, and Kenya—is examining different carbon tax models to help fund climate initiatives.
One widely discussed model is a flat-rate levy of $150 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), increasing every five years. Other proposals include a $100/ton tax beginning in 2027, supported by the EU and Japan, and a more modest $18.75/ton tax proposed by nations like the Bahamas and Liberia.
According to GSLT estimates, a carbon levy between $150 and $300/ton could generate up to $127 billion per year from 2027 to 2030. Although revenue would decrease as shipping emissions fall—down to $103 billion in 2031–2040 and $36 billion in 2041–2050—this tax remains a promising, scalable solution.
Aviation: Taking Climate Taxation to New Heights
Aviation accounts for roughly 2% of global emissions and typically enjoys exemption from value-added tax (VAT) and sales taxes. The GSLT proposes several new levies to address this gap, including taxes on kerosene fuel, luxury flight tickets, private jet use, and frequent flyer programs.
These aviation-related taxes could generate anywhere from $19 billion to $164 billion per year. While 29 countries already apply some form of tax on aviation fuel—through excise duties or carbon levies—international consensus remains a challenge.
Legal hurdles and concerns about a level playing field among global carriers complicate the implementation of broader levies.
Still, several countries already impose airline ticket taxes. Portugal, for example, levies around 2 euros per ticket, while the UK charges nearly 500 euros for certain long-haul flights.
These examples prove that aviation taxes can be introduced at varying levels while still supporting significant climate funding goals.
Fossil Fuels: Redirecting Profits Toward Planet Protection
Fossil fuels remain one of the most heavily taxed sectors, but new proposals suggest there's room for more targeted levies. A “Climate Damages Tax” of $5 per ton of extracted fossil fuel could raise an estimated $216 billion in 2024 alone, according to Greenpeace.
In addition, ActionAid proposes a 50% tax on the windfall profits of the 14 largest fossil fuel companies. Such a measure, if applied to the period ending July 2023, could have raised $173 billion.
These types of tax solutions not only support climate goals but also serve as a form of corporate accountability.
Financial Transactions: A Revenue Powerhouse
More than 30 countries—including major economies like Britain, France, Italy, and Spain—currently impose taxes on financial transactions. However, a global, standardized tax could multiply their impact.
The Austrian Institute of Economic Research suggests that a global tax of 0.1% on stock and bond trades and 0.01% on derivatives could generate between $238 billion and $419 billion annually.
Such a tax could offer both relief to overburdened public budgets and a steady revenue stream for climate finance.
While implementation would require extensive international cooperation, especially across regulatory frameworks, the potential financial benefits make it a serious contender.
Carbon Pricing: Building on Existing Infrastructure
Carbon taxes and emissions trading systems (ETS) are already in place in 83 jurisdictions, covering 24% of global emissions. There are currently 75 carbon pricing mechanisms—36 are ETS and 39 are carbon taxes.
Expanding and strengthening these systems could be a natural next step toward reaching the $1 trillion funding goal.
Further coordination and the harmonization of carbon prices across regions would help close loopholes, prevent “carbon leakage,” and ensure fairness in global trade. Scaling up these mechanisms could provide both a tax relief strategy for struggling nations and an equitable climate solution.
Final Thoughts: Are New Taxes the Key to Climate Progress?
As world leaders converge at COP29, innovative tax solutions may provide the financial bridge needed to close the climate funding gap. From shipping and aviation to fossil fuels and financial markets, these proposed levies are more than just tools for revenue generation—they’re strategic measures to ensure global solidarity in the fight against climate change.
While implementing new international taxes comes with challenges, the potential rewards—both environmental and financial—are too significant to ignore. Tax policy, often seen as a national issue, could soon become one of the most effective global tools for climate action.